California Construction & Fire Restoration, Inc.

Opinions are split. Several reviewers report major post‑restoration problems such as plumbing and electrical failures, poor material quality, and high additional repair costs, suggesting unreliability. However, multiple customers highlight timely, code‑compliant work, excellent communication, and high-quality finishes, indicating reliability for many projects.

Source: 2 of 8 reviews • Confidence: medium (conflicting themes)

Multiple customers praise the skilled tradesmen, good fit and finish, and adherence to updated code requirements, describing the work as professional and exceeding expectations. Conversely, one reviewer explicitly states that cheap materials were used and that the workmanship was poor, leading to early structural issues.

Source: 2 of 8 reviews • Confidence: medium (mixed evidence)

Most positive reviews emphasize clear, responsive communication and prompt addressing of client concerns, such as floor type, paint color, and shingle selection. The negative review also mentions lacking communication and minimal accountability.

Source: 5 of 8 reviews • Confidence: high (recurring theme)

One reviewer reports severe problems: a newly built two‑car garage was repeatedly rejected by city inspectors and resulted in wasted funds, and unfinished attic spaces with exposed wiring were left unresolved. No other reviews mention similar structural addition issues.

Source: 1 of 8 reviews • Confidence: low (single case)