Michael M Fanous Inc

Several reviewers reported unsatisfactory initial consultations, with one noting the doctor proposed preemptive surgery after a brief 10‑second examination and another stating the doctor recorded pain despite the patient explicitly denying it. These experiences suggest the clinic may not conduct comprehensive initial assessments.

Source: 2 of 4 reviews • Confidence: medium (explicit mention)

One review highlighted unclean practices, specifically mentioning that a nurse reused an ace wrap and bootie without properly cleaning the wound, raising concerns about infection control.

Source: 1 of 4 reviews • Confidence: medium (explicit mention)

A review indicated significant billing issues, with the patient receiving a $10,000 bill for services (primarily sonograms) that were supposedly covered by insurance, eventually sent to collections. This suggests potential transparency problems in billing practices.

Source: 1 of 4 reviews • Confidence: medium (explicit mention)

Overall, the reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with multiple complaints about misdiagnosis, rushed examinations, unclean procedures, and billing disputes. No positive feedback was noted in the provided reviews.

Source: 4 of 4 reviews • Confidence: high (recurring theme)