Stucco Masters of CA

One review describes a severe case of theft and fraud, alleging that the contractor took materials intended for the job and billed the client for them, suggesting dishonest practices. However, five other reviewers express complete satisfaction with the quality of work, stating it exceeded expectations and looked great. The conflicting accounts indicate mixed reliability perceptions.

Source: 6 of 7 reviews • Confidence: medium (conflicting themes)

The negative review claims the contractor misrepresented his ability to perform interior skim coating, stating he lied about his expertise and used incorrect exterior materials for an interior job. No positive reviews mention interior work, so the overall capability for interior projects is unclear based on the available feedback.

Source: 1 of 7 reviews • Confidence: low (single conflicting account)

Multiple reviewers (five out of seven) report being completely satisfied with the work, noting that it was professional and exceeded their expectations, resulting in a house that looks great.

Source: 5 of 7 reviews • Confidence: high (explicit mention)

One review alleges fraudulent billing for materials not used on the job and theft of materials, suggesting poor material handling and dishonest billing practices. No other reviews mention such issues.

Source: 1 of 7 reviews • Confidence: low (single conflicting account)